Transit dump prompted by

Another question from my secret which necessitates a blog post!

While I guess I have a ok grasp of your thoughts on GTA transit, just want a more concrete answer on the following: 1) Transit in Scarborough 2) Metrolinx taking over TTC 3) Future expansion of TTC 4) Gardiner Expressway 5) solving Yonge line being at capacity 6) improving commuting and intercity?

Now, time for some speed writing and let’s see if I can do this from memory.

  1. The Scarborough RT should be replaced by an LRT. Literally the only reason to justify an extension of the Bloor-Danforth line is to save the transfer, which is a problem that can be solved easily with cross-platform transfers. There is no other reason. There’s no reason for it to go underground, since it already runs in its own rail corridor, separated from traffic. The projected ridership doesn’t justify the capital cost and all of the cost projections that have been done so far ignore the operating costs.

    A lot of people are under the impression that an LRT system would fall to the same shortcomings of the SRT. This is wrong. Most of the failures of the current system are because of the legacy ICTS vehicles (which we can’t replace) and trouble with the third rail in winter (which wouldn’t be a problem since LRT power is delivered via overhead wire).

    A lot of people also seem to be under the impression that the subway is a done deal. It is not. There’s still years of environmental assessments and design work and financing and procurement and tendering that needs to be worked out. It still has to go through three council votes (EA approval, financing, LRT master agreement amendment) before a single shovel is thrust into the ground. All of this extra work and these votes become unnecessary the moment council decides to build an LRT after all.

  2. Metrolinx taking over the TTC is a monumentally stupid idea because of what exactly is being proposed. No one is actually proposing that Metrolinx takes control of the TTC, they only want Metrolinx to take control of the rapid transit lines. This is a problem since the rapid transit lines are the most profitable operations in the system. Removing that money from the TTC makes it much harder to run the heavily unprofitable suburban surface routes.
  3. The Transit City plan: LRT to replace the most heavily used bus routes and corridors in the former municipalities, the Whatever Relief Line from Pape to King to Dundas West, increase bus service along identified routes to ten minute headways, implement transit signal priority to improve surface routes, etc.
  4. I don’t actually know that much about the Gardiner, so I’d go with the staff recommendation. Apparently, they don’t see it as apocalyptic to remove the eastern portion of the Gardiner as long as the necessary transit infrastructure is build and based on my admittedly low commuting on that route (taking Lake Shore from the east and down to Queen’s Quay), I’d agree with their recommendations.
  5. There are a bunch of ways to do this but the DRL is the simplest. Obviously, there are ways to try and slow down the problem like automatic train control and the TRs were supposed to help in that respect. In the end, I don’t think there’s anything that’ll make any significant inroads short of creating another north-south route to divert commuters.
  6. High speed rail is obviously the dream, but I don’t think it’s attainable or even necessary. At this point, I’d be really pleased with rail travel being made more affordable and frequent. Does that mean electrification? I don’t really know, but the federal government’s cuts to Via definitely haven’t been helping. It’s unfortunate, because Via could be a decent way to travel if it wasn’t as expensive and inconvenient.